Richard Huxton wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> - improve RI check perf by caching small, static tables in each backend
>> - apply index filter conditions on index scan to avoid heap lookup
> For fkey checks against a basically static table could you get away with
> just checking the index and not the table?
I'm not sure that would fly, there is always the possibility it could
change, I think the ENUMs patch will solve this performance problem.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD||Date: 2006-12-21 14:39:07|
|Subject: Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2|
|Previous:||From: Matthew O'Connor||Date: 2006-12-21 14:30:06|
|Subject: Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum|