From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dhanaraj M <Dhanaraj(dot)M(at)sun(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around |
Date: | 2006-12-14 14:34:47 |
Message-ID: | 45816107.80807@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Zdenek,
Does this occur when you click the Add Server option, or when you hit OK
having filled in the dialog?
Thanks, Dave (waiting for his Solaris build to complete...)
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm still not sure how you're getting into that code when you close
>> the form though...
>
> I have received following error when a wnat to "add server":
>
>
> (pgadmin3:27830): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkliststore.c: line 570:
> assertion `GTK_LIST_STORE (tree_model)->stamp == iter->stamp' failed
>
> (pgadmin3:27830): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gtype.c:3350: type id `0' is
> invalid
>
> (pgadmin3:27830): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: can't peek value table for
> type `<invalid>' which is not currently referenced
> Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
>
> and backtrace is following:
>
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.9`gtk_tree_model_get_valist+0x144(19eb8e8,
> ffbfde44, ffbfde2c, 8800, f0c40, 38)
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.9`gtk_tree_model_get+0xd8(19eb8e8, ffbfde44,
> 8800, f0d1c, fd1257a4, fd2de53c)
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.9`gtk_combo_box_entry_active_changed+0x98(18dbfc0,
> 1bd0, 2372e8, fbb75f48, fd2de53c, 1800)
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.1`g_closure_invoke+0x174(ffbfe0e8, ffbfdf7c, 1,
> 10000, 0, 18d4640)
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.1`signal_emit_unlocked_R+0xb70(fbb6b034,
> fbb9eaf8, fbabee34, fbabee20, fbb9eae4, 18d4f60)
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.1`g_signal_emit_valist+0x7f8(18dbfc0, 18d6ad8,
> 18d4f60, ffbfe31c, fbb9eaf8, fbabee2c)
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.1`g_signal_emit_by_name+0x190(18dbfc0, fd2a3a84,
> fbabec00, 0, 1a624e0, fbb9eaf8)
> libwx_gtk2ud_core-2.8.so.0.0.0`void
> wxComboBox::SetSelection+0xd8(18d4bc0, 0, 1, ffbfe414, 0, 0)
> dlgServer::dlgServer #Nvariant 1+0x550(ffbfe568, 12d89ec, 16a9ea0, 0,
> 182c0f0, fe062370)
> wxWindow*addServerFactory::StartDialog+0x54(182a3d0, 16a9ea0, 0, 8602bc,
> 182a3d0, 16a9ea0)
>
> ....
>
> If I compare it with Dhanaraj problem there are some similar things. In
> both cases some combobox widget is present and some signal occurs. I
> guess that there should be some race condition or some unforgotten
> combobox which receives signals, but it has pointer to non existing memory.
>
> Zdenek
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-12-14 15:20:54 | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Developer.pgadmin.org |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2006-12-14 13:46:51 | pgAdmin3 snapshots(1.6.2) on OpenSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise |