Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>
Cc: Dhanaraj M <Dhanaraj(dot)M(at)sun(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around
Date: 2006-12-14 14:34:47
Message-ID: 45816107.80807@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Zdenek,

Does this occur when you click the Add Server option, or when you hit OK
having filled in the dialog?

Thanks, Dave (waiting for his Solaris build to complete...)

Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm still not sure how you're getting into that code when you close
>> the form though...
>
> I have received following error when a wnat to "add server":
>
>
> (pgadmin3:27830): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkliststore.c: line 570:
> assertion `GTK_LIST_STORE (tree_model)->stamp == iter->stamp' failed
>
> (pgadmin3:27830): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gtype.c:3350: type id `0' is
> invalid
>
> (pgadmin3:27830): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: can't peek value table for
> type `<invalid>' which is not currently referenced
> Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
>
> and backtrace is following:
>
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.9`gtk_tree_model_get_valist+0x144(19eb8e8,
> ffbfde44, ffbfde2c, 8800, f0c40, 38)
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.9`gtk_tree_model_get+0xd8(19eb8e8, ffbfde44,
> 8800, f0d1c, fd1257a4, fd2de53c)
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.9`gtk_combo_box_entry_active_changed+0x98(18dbfc0,
> 1bd0, 2372e8, fbb75f48, fd2de53c, 1800)
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.1`g_closure_invoke+0x174(ffbfe0e8, ffbfdf7c, 1,
> 10000, 0, 18d4640)
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.1`signal_emit_unlocked_R+0xb70(fbb6b034,
> fbb9eaf8, fbabee34, fbabee20, fbb9eae4, 18d4f60)
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.1`g_signal_emit_valist+0x7f8(18dbfc0, 18d6ad8,
> 18d4f60, ffbfe31c, fbb9eaf8, fbabee2c)
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.400.1`g_signal_emit_by_name+0x190(18dbfc0, fd2a3a84,
> fbabec00, 0, 1a624e0, fbb9eaf8)
> libwx_gtk2ud_core-2.8.so.0.0.0`void
> wxComboBox::SetSelection+0xd8(18d4bc0, 0, 1, ffbfe414, 0, 0)
> dlgServer::dlgServer #Nvariant 1+0x550(ffbfe568, 12d89ec, 16a9ea0, 0,
> 182c0f0, fe062370)
> wxWindow*addServerFactory::StartDialog+0x54(182a3d0, 16a9ea0, 0, 8602bc,
> 182a3d0, 16a9ea0)
>
> ....
>
> If I compare it with Dhanaraj problem there are some similar things. In
> both cases some combobox widget is present and some signal occurs. I
> guess that there should be some race condition or some unforgotten
> combobox which receives signals, but it has pointer to non existing memory.
>
> Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-12-14 15:20:54 Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Developer.pgadmin.org
Previous Message Hiroshi Saito 2006-12-14 13:46:51 pgAdmin3 snapshots(1.6.2) on OpenSUSE and SUSE Linux Enterprise