Ahh, sorry..like the spam....
again!

I thought over that the existing msvc the did not have uneasines.
so, I wish to make it this as correspondence with worried Magnus-san.
It is after sufficient test.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>


> Ooops, sorry., One mistake:-(
> Please this.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
> 
> 
>> Hi.
>> 
>> I am checking that consider sufficient test as Marko-san and it is satisfactory. 
>> However, That there is a portion which does not suit the solution of MSVC 
>> also understands. Therefore, How is this proposal? 
>> 
>> 1. )remove pgevent.def
>> It is always generated. 
>> 
>> 2.) improvement of the Makefile and Solution.pm
>> 
>> What do you think? 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Hiroshi Saito
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

• Re: pgevent warnings on mingw at 2009-02-01 02:51:06 from Hiroshi Saito

Responses

• Re: pgevent warnings on mingw at 2009-02-03 14:46:52 from Magnus Hagander

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2009-02-01 04:37:39
	Subject: add_path optimization
Previous:	From: KaiGai Kohei	Date: 2009-02-01 03:08:06
	Subject: Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable