Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: xml2 still essential for us

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: greg(at)ngender(dot)net
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lynn Dobbs <lynn(at)creditlink(dot)com>
Subject: Re: xml2 still essential for us
Date: 2010-01-13 05:34:40
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"J. Greg Davidson" <greg(at)ngender(dot)net> writes:
> (4) In conclusion, I hope that PostgreSQL will keep xml2
> or something similar even when the XSLT and speculative parsing
> issues have been addressed.

Are you sufficiently excited about it to fix its memory management

If we're going to keep it, it needs significant work.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2010-01-13 06:07:52
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-01-13 05:34:26
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group