Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: xml2 still essential for us

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: greg(at)ngender(dot)net
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lynn Dobbs <lynn(at)creditlink(dot)com>
Subject: Re: xml2 still essential for us
Date: 2010-01-13 05:34:40
Message-ID: 4572.1263360880@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"J. Greg Davidson" <greg(at)ngender(dot)net> writes:
> (4) In conclusion, I hope that PostgreSQL will keep xml2
> or something similar even when the XSLT and speculative parsing
> issues have been addressed.

Are you sufficiently excited about it to fix its memory management
issues?
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4A6A276A.6090405@dunslane.net
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-09/msg00359.php

If we're going to keep it, it needs significant work.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2010-01-13 06:07:52
Subject: Re: lock_timeout GUC patch
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-01-13 05:34:26
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group