| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 open items list |
| Date: | 2006-11-23 19:52:38 |
| Message-ID: | 4565FC06.5030202@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
>> Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects
>> into the pg_catalog schema:
>
> Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought
> the conclusion was to leave it as-is.
Yes, that was what i thought when I reviewed the thread last time this
was re-raised:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00164.php
I will also point out the pgAdmin 1.6 has now been released so
incompatible changes in this area now *will* mean functionality
regressions for users of 8.2 over users of 8.1 and 8.0, especially on
Windows where adminpack has always been bundled.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-11-23 22:08:39 | Avg performance for int8/numeric |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-23 19:47:27 | Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3 |