Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'

From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
Date: 2006-11-22 17:42:14
Message-ID: 45648BF6.5050500@bluegap.ch (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Hi,

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> PostgreSQL doesn't ship a integrated replication solution, BECAUSE not
> any one replication solution can fit the need.

Yes, that's what I'm saying.

Please do not mix cause and effect: no replication solution got into 
core because none fit all the needs. It's not that we have a policy 
stating that we don't want any replication solution in core. What could 
possibly be the reasons for such a policy?

Regards

Markus

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2006-11-22 17:50:58
Subject: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-11-22 17:30:54
Subject: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2006-11-22 17:50:58
Subject: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-11-22 17:30:54
Subject: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group