| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SPF Record ... |
| Date: | 2006-11-17 13:37:02 |
| Message-ID: | 455DBAFE.4050405@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 17. November 2006 07:05 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
>
>> I'm thinking of adding one to DNS, but after reading up on it, I'm a bit
>> concerned how this might affect some
>>
>
> I urge you in the strongest possible terms not to do that. As someone who is
> professionally involved in that issue, I can tell you that SPF is both
> useless and dangerous. It doesn't stop any spam, but it breaks email
> protocols, annoys and restricts users for no gain.
>
IMHO, follow KISS. There is no reason to complicate the environment for
the purpose of complicating the environment.
My question would be, what is it that you feel SPF may do for
postgresql.org? Can that same thing be accomplished with
other technology?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-11-17 13:50:04 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-17 13:35:26 | Re: SPF Record ... |