Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SPF Record ...

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPF Record ...
Date: 2006-11-17 13:35:26
Message-ID: 455DBA9E.5070300@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
> Since those having @postgresql.org accounts shoudl be limited to these two 
> lists, can anyone comment on a) is this a bad idea? and b) would they be 
> affected because they don't use SMTP AUTH and c) why aren't you using SMTP 
> AUTH? ...
>
>   
Are you saying that you don't *require* smtp auth? What about TLS? IMHO 
you should be requiring
SMTP+TLS for all servers and users relaying through any @postgresql.org 
server.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> Thx ...
>
>   


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-11-17 13:37:02
Subject: Re: SPF Record ...
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2006-11-17 13:24:21
Subject: Re: SPF Record ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group