Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: replication docs: split single vs. multi-master

From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication docs: split single vs. multi-master
Date: 2006-11-16 22:02:46
Message-ID: 455CE006.4050708@bluegap.ch (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am now attaching the additional text I added based on your comments. 
> I have also changed the markup so all the solutions appear on the same
> web page.  I think seeing it all together might give us new ideas for
> improvement.

Good, it's definitely better to have it all on one page.

I just thought about the words 'master' and 'slave', which are 
admittedly quite unfortunate. I remember reading about efforts to remove 
them from geek-speech. They proposed to introduce better names. At least 
with the old IDE drives, master- and slave-drives seem to disappear now...

Regards

Markus


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-11-16 22:09:46
Subject: Re: Cast null to int4 upgrading from Version 7.2
Previous:From: Gurjeet SinghDate: 2006-11-16 21:50:49
Subject: A suggestion on PG_TRY() exception handling code.

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-11-16 22:09:46
Subject: Re: Cast null to int4 upgrading from Version 7.2
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-11-16 21:50:31
Subject: Re: replication docs: split single vs. multi-master

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group