Re: string_to_array eats too much memory?

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: string_to_array eats too much memory?
Date: 2006-11-08 10:03:40
Message-ID: 4551AB7C.2040009@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I'm testing how GIN scales.

Have a look at http://www.sigaev.ru/cvsweb/cvsweb.cgi/ftsbench/ - utility is
specially developed for measuring performance of full-text solutions ( now it
supports PgSQL( GiST, GIN ) and MySQL ). Right now I'm searching good query
statistic for simulate load, but this data is a closed information in
internet-wide search engines :(

> ? I thought GIN is superior than tsearch2.
>
> From your GIN proposal posted to pgsql-hackers:
>
> "The primary goal of the Gin index is a scalable full text search in
> PostgreSQL"

GIN itself is a just a tool for speedup searches, linguistic part is still in
tsearch2.

It's possible to use tsearch2 without any indexes at all. GiST and GIN is a way
to speedup searches.

Of course, you can develop another framework for full text search and framework
may use GIN as it wish :)

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-11-08 10:19:54 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-11-08 09:47:29 Re: string_to_array eats too much memory?