| From: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation |
| Date: | 2006-11-03 17:37:33 |
| Message-ID: | 454B7E5D.5030704@phlo.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
> Since 8.1 has done this all along and no one's actually complained about
> it, I guess no one is using scripts that do "cd". I'm inclined to go
> with Bernd's suggestion to change the docs to match the code, but does
> anyone have a contrary opinion?
I think supplying the absolute path makes archiving scripts less
error-prone, which is a good time. So I'd vote for absolute paths.
greetings, Florian Pflug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2006-11-03 18:03:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-03 17:08:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-03 23:09:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-11-03 16:34:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation |