Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm a bit
> dubious that the prepared-statement machinery actually results in a win
> compared to just issuing simple Query messages.
The driver has no infrastructure for issuing simple Query messages in v3
mode, and anyway we want to batch the BEGIN up with the query that
COMMIT/ROLLBACK might be of dubious value but I don't know if it's worth
having a completely separate code path in the driver just for that one case.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Oliver Jowett||Date: 2006-10-31 11:55:22|
|Subject: Re: confused about transactions and connection pools|
|Previous:||From: Tom Arthurs||Date: 2006-10-31 10:45:00|
|Subject: Re: Date time format out of range????|