Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anyone using a SAN?

From: "Peter Koczan" <pjkoczan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone using a SAN?
Date: 2008-02-14 04:17:56
Message-ID: 4544e0330802132017n4763babeuc67665bed099cee9@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Thanks for all your input, it is very helpful. A SAN for our postgres
deployment is probably sufficient in terms of performance, because we
just don't have that much data. I'm a little concerned about needs for
user and research databases, but if a project needs a big, fast
database, it might be wise to have them shell out for DAS.

My co-workers and I are meeting with a vendor in two weeks (3Par,
specifically), and I think I have a better idea of what I should be
looking at. I'll keep you all up on the situation. Keep the ideas
coming as I still would like to know of any other important factors.

Thanks again.

Peter

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2008-02-14 10:12:36
Subject: Re: Anyone using a SAN?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-02-14 03:23:04
Subject: Re: Anyone using a SAN?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group