Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2
Date: 2006-10-27 19:56:51
Message-ID: 45426483.6080304@Yahoo.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/27/2006 3:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> since rev. 1.105 of include/port.h all files that inlcude postgres_fe.h 
>> are forced to use pg_qsort() instead of qsort. Was that intended?
> 
> Is it a problem?  If you really want the platform qsort you can #undef
> qsort, but I don't entirely see why you would.

It forces client programs to link against libpgport, which they didn't 
have to before.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Richard TroyDate: 2006-10-27 19:57:34
Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-10-27 19:47:41
Subject: Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group