On 10/27/2006 3:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> since rev. 1.105 of include/port.h all files that inlcude postgres_fe.h
>> are forced to use pg_qsort() instead of qsort. Was that intended?
> Is it a problem? If you really want the platform qsort you can #undef
> qsort, but I don't entirely see why you would.
It forces client programs to link against libpgport, which they didn't
have to before.
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Richard Troy||Date: 2006-10-27 19:57:34|
|Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-10-27 19:47:41|
|Subject: Re: qsort->pg_qsort in 8.2 |