Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Anyway, it is probably not expected by many users that loading a module
>> in plperlu makes it available to plperl - I was slightly surprised
>> myself to see it work and I am probably more aware than most of perl and
>> plperl subtleties.
> I think that is a bug and needs to be fixed. We have the precedent of
> pltcl, which uses separate interpreters for pltcl and pltclu for exactly
> this reason.
I am not sure what our release timetable is - and presumably this should
also be backpatched if we regard it as a bug. I won't be able to do much
on this front for the next 2 weeks at least.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Treat||Date: 2006-10-26 19:06:13|
|Subject: Re: Replication documentation addition|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-10-26 18:32:07|
|Subject: Re: GUC description cleanup |