| From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| Date: | 2006-10-25 15:43:50 |
| Message-ID: | 453F8636.2070906@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Those to statements are at odds with each other, at least based on
> everyone I've ever talked to in a commercial setting. People will use
> terms like 'replication', 'HA' or 'clustering' fairly interchangably.
> Usually what these folks want is some kind of high-availability
> solution. A few are more concerned with scalability. Sometimes it's a
> combination of both. That's why I think it's good for the chapter to
> deal with both aspects of this.
Yabut... at least the PostgreSQL manual should uses the terms correctly.
And while I do perfectly agree that it's a fail-over solution and it
should be mentioned in that section, I'm arguing that it's not replication.
Regards
Markus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-25 15:44:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-25 15:41:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-25 15:44:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-25 15:41:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |