Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Incorrect behavior with CE and ORDER BY

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect behavior with CE and ORDER BY
Date: 2006-10-24 17:46:23
Message-ID: 453E516F.1070506@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> We have a problem with CE that I want to verify is either expected
>> behavior, a bug or something else :).
> 
> Uh, what's your problem exactly?  The example only seems to demonstrate
> that if you don't ask for a sort, you don't get one.

Sorry. The problem is, if I ask for an ORDER BY it scans all partitions
versus only scanning the partition that has the data in it.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 


-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-10-24 17:47:34
Subject: Re: Incorrect behavior with CE and ORDER BY
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-10-24 17:31:03
Subject: Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group