| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Duncan Garland <duncan(dot)garland(at)ntlworld(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
| Date: | 2006-10-21 20:48:44 |
| Message-ID: | 453A87AC.6000202@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Josh,
>
>> I would further argue that many of the features being pushed for 8.3,
>> recursive queries, bitmap indexes, rollup/group by, updateable queries
>> are the direct result of positioning either against Oracle/MSSQL or
>> MySQL pending feature sets. (Although more toward Oracle/MSSQL certainly).
>
> Huh? While "keeping up with the Ellisons" is a motivating factor, it's not
That is all I am saying.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-10-22 00:54:58 | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
| Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2006-10-21 20:26:02 | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |