| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, david(at)fetter(dot)org, gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net, ads(at)pgug(dot)de |
| Subject: | Re: About docbot |
| Date: | 2006-10-10 03:06:39 |
| Message-ID: | 452B0E3F.5070704@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
>>
>
> Dave, whats your opinion on moving the database completly onto the
> postgresql.org server and doing away with the slony replication bit (which
> seems like overkill imho) We could then grant access to bots that need it or
> provide a full fledged web api to people who want to interface with it. The
> one thing I am wondering is that this would in theory be a higher load than
> the current website gives, since all requests would run through the db.
Actually not to worried about this one. I can always beef up the machine.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-10-10 07:31:39 | Re: About docbot |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-10-10 02:17:11 | Re: About docbot |