From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL rebranding |
Date: | 2006-08-30 08:13:56 |
Message-ID: | 44F548C4.9040304@pooteeweet.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus schrieb:
> Lukas,
>
>>>> Illustra, EnterpriseDB, Bizgres, BizgresMPP, Mammoth, Red Hat
>>>> Database, Netezza, parACCEL
>
> Note that BizgresMPP, Netezza, UltraSQL and Illustra had substantial code
> changes from the Postgres they branched off of. For Netezza, for example,
> it would be more accurate to say that they *used* PostgreSQL code rather
> than re-branding it ... Postgres comprises only about 1/4 to 1/3 of their
> code according to the Netezza president.
Yeah thats fine. Like I said my definition of what I am looking for is
kinda fuzzy (I will try to further clarify it - I think the best
approach so far has been to say anything that either tries to be a fork
by renaming or that is a fork by changing/adding significant code that
is not intended to be made available upstream).
Anyways thanks for all the input.
So should I work on this inside the newly build wiki? I guess I will
just ask the maintainer for an account and I will see what happens :)
Otherwise I will probably just publish the list on my open source
related stuff wiki ..
regards,
Lukas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2006-08-30 09:50:31 | Re: PostgreSQL rebranding |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2006-08-30 03:44:54 | Re: database contest results |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2006-08-30 09:50:31 | Re: PostgreSQL rebranding |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-30 02:05:41 | Re: Search is now in sync |