Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures
Date: 2006-08-29 15:55:25
Message-ID: 44F4636D.5000905@pse-consulting.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>   
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>     
>>> My objection here is basically that this proposal passed on the
>>> assumption that it would be very nearly zero effort to make it happen.
>>>       
>
>   
>> Kicking out autovacuum as default is a disaster, it took far too long to
>> get in the backend already (wasn't it planned for 8.0?).
>>     
>
> If it's so "disastrous" to not have it, why wasn't it even proposed
> until two weeks after feature freeze? 
To me, this proposal was just too obvious, for reasons already discussed
earlier.

Regards,
Andreas


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2006-08-29 15:58:29
Subject: Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures
Previous:From: Bernd HelmleDate: 2006-08-29 15:53:03
Subject: Re: Updatable views

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group