Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO

From: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Date: 2006-08-28 19:07:10
Message-ID: 44F33EDE.5030301@dunaweb.hu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu> writes:
>   
>> Alvaro Herrera írta:
>>     
>>> Hum, are you going to put back the original cruft to support copy view?
>>> I suggest you don't do that.
>>>       
>
>   
>> Well, the other way around is to teach heap_open()
>> to use views. Brrr. Would it be any cleaner?
>>     
>
> Don't even think of going there ;-)
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>   

I didn't. :-)

Here's my last, the "cruft" (i.e. COPY view TO support
by rewriting to a SELECT) put back. Tested and
docs modified accordingly.

You can find the previous one (v10) on the list
without it if you need it.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi


Attachment: pgsql-copyselect-11.patch.gz
Description: application/x-tar (12.4 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Chris MairDate: 2006-08-28 19:17:30
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets in
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-08-28 18:51:17
Subject: Re: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Chris MairDate: 2006-08-28 19:17:30
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] updated patch for selecting large results sets in
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-28 17:57:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group