| From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Subject: | Re: Replication Documentation |
| Date: | 2006-08-28 09:07:14 |
| Message-ID: | 44F2B242.60807@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Monday 21 August 2006 09:47, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
>> has there been a consensus about where a replication document should go
>> and what it should cover?
>
> I think the general idea is to toss it on techdocs... like the GUI Tools
> page... http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54
Hm. I didn't know that one. There is already a section about
replication. Chris, do you agree to put your article there?
But AFAIK the goal of our discussion was to put _something_ into the
official documentation to make it better visible. Lots of people ask for
replication solutions, but up to now there is no official statement. So
newcomers need to google around, figure out about lots of different
projects, partly dead ones, etc...
If we put an extensive replication article in the techdocs, we need to
link it somehow from the main documentatino, IMHO. Otherwise it probably
won't help that much.
Regards
Markus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-28 14:48:53 | Re: Replication Documentation |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-08-27 19:39:08 | Re: Replication Documentation |