Tom Lane wrote:
> Another issue I noted in that same area is that spi.c does not set
> SPI_processed for a utility statement, even if the utility statement
> returns tuples. Is this a bug, or should we leave it alone?
Bug or not, it's at least a limitation we could do without, I think.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jonah H. Harris||Date: 2006-08-24 19:22:51|
|Subject: Re: PL/Perl: spi_prepare() and RETURNING|
|Previous:||From: Bernd Helmle||Date: 2006-08-24 19:08:32|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updatable views|