Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] COPY view

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY view
Date: 2006-08-23 12:08:24
Message-ID: 44EC4538.4040800@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> At the moment, with the online-index and updatable-views patches both
> pretty seriously broken, and no sign that the bitmap-index people are
> awake at all, I might take it on myself to fix this one instead of those
> others.  But is that what I should be spending my time on in the waning
> days of the 8.2 freeze cycle?  Speak now or hold your peace.
>
> 			
>   

Personally, I would say that this is less important than updatable views 
but more than  online indexes. If it could be fixed just for the view 
case in a day or so then I think it's worth it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg StarkDate: 2006-08-23 12:11:24
Subject: Re: Question about (lazy) vacuum
Previous:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2006-08-23 12:08:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of backslash in tsearch2

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-23 12:24:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY view
Previous:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2006-08-23 12:08:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Use of backslash in tsearch2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group