Joshua Reich wrote:
> I just updated to the latest HEAD, so I assume I have the cube_1.out
> that you changed. If you look at the order of the results expected in
> cube.out and cube_1.out, they are different. So I don't think we have
> a problem with the code, we just need to fix the ordering in cube_1.out.
The version where I reverted the change is 1.6.
There is apparently a code problem somehow, since we know that AIX/PPC
at least orders things differently on those 2 tests.
I have looked at the new code and can't see any obvious reason for
Maybe we need to try to stress test the comparison routines a bit to
make sure they really are deterministic.
> The same problem appears in cube_2.out -- is this used by any platform?
We will deal with that one in due course.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2006-07-27 21:01:37|
|Subject: Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2006-07-27 20:45:57|
|Subject: Warnings in pgstattuple|