Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>As I understand this, the probe file is compiled into some sort of
>object file which is linked into the binary.
>So if we ever have probes
>in other components, we'd probably want to have separate probe source
>and object files for them. That would seem better than one big probe
>file that is linked in everywhere.
We agreed that there would only be one provider called postgresql, and I
believe (need to double check) all the probes have to be defined in the
same provider in the same file. What you suggest sounds like a good way
to separate probes from different components.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2006-07-24 01:18:33|
|Subject: Re: RESET CONNECTION?|
|Previous:||From: Robert Lor||Date: 2006-07-24 00:52:12|
|Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2006-07-24 03:57:14|
|Subject: Values list-of-targetlists patch for comments (was Re:
[HACKERS] 8.2 features?)|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2006-07-23 19:50:39|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch|