Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL

From: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Date: 2006-07-24 00:52:12
Message-ID: 44C419BC.1050503@sun.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:

>Yeah, those seem plausible, although the hold time for
>CheckpointStartLock seems awfully high --- about 20 msec
>per transaction.  Are you using a nonzero commit_delay?
>
>
>  
>
I didn't change commit_delay which defaults to zero.


Regards,
-Robert


In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-24 01:29:39
Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-23 23:52:16
Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert LorDate: 2006-07-24 01:00:31
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Previous:From: Luke LonerganDate: 2006-07-24 00:35:37
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group