Tom Lane wrote:
>Those numbers look a bit suspicious --- I'd expect to see some of the
>LWLocks being taken in both shared and exclusive modes, but you don't
>show any such cases. You sure your script is counting correctly?
I'll double check to make sure no stupid mistakes were made!
>Also, it'd be interesting to count time spent holding shared lock
>separately from time spent holding exclusive.
Will provide that data later today.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Kevin McArthur||Date: 2006-07-21 18:15:28|
|Subject: Bad Planner Statistics for Uneven distribution.|
|Previous:||From: Sven Geisler||Date: 2006-07-21 14:59:49|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Lor||Date: 2006-07-21 15:13:53|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace|
|Previous:||From: Robert Lor||Date: 2006-07-21 15:03:47|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch|