Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql
Date: 2006-07-20 13:54:58
Message-ID: 44BF8B32.8020507@boreham.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Guoping Zhang wrote:

>
>a)  SERVER A to SERVER B: 0.35ms
>    SERVER A to itself (Local host): 0.022ms
>
>  
>
0.35ms seems rather slow. You might try investigating what's in the path.
For comparison, between two machines here (three GigE switches in the
path), I see 0.10ms RTT. Between two machines on the same switch I
get 0.08ms.





In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-20 19:01:58
Subject: Re: Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Guoping ZhangDate: 2006-07-20 06:32:45
Subject: Re: Performance penalty for remote access of postgresql (8.1.3)? any experiance?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group