Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(dot)ebrecht(at)credativ(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Date: 2006-07-19 01:18:12
Message-ID: 44BD8854.9060506@calorieking.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> I did some experimentation just now, and could not get mysql to accept a
> command longer than about 1 million bytes. It complains about
> Got a packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes
> which seems a bit odd because max_allowed_packet is allegedly set to
> 16 million, but anyway I don't think people are going to be loading any
> million-row tables using single INSERT commands in mysql either.

Strange. Last time I checked I thought MySQL dump used 'multivalue
lists in inserts' for dumps, for the same reason that we use COPY

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-07-19 01:20:29 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous Message Matthew D. Fuller 2006-07-18 23:41:49 Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-07-19 01:20:29 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-07-19 01:11:58 Re: url for TODO item, is it right?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-07-19 01:20:29 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous Message Matthew D. Fuller 2006-07-18 23:41:49 Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?