Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>,Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>,"Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(dot)ebrecht(at)credativ(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Date: 2006-07-19 01:18:12
Message-ID: 44BD8854.9060506@calorieking.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> I did some experimentation just now, and could not get mysql to accept a
> command longer than about 1 million bytes.  It complains about 
> 	Got a packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes
> which seems a bit odd because max_allowed_packet is allegedly set to
> 16 million, but anyway I don't think people are going to be loading any
> million-row tables using single INSERT commands in mysql either.

Strange.  Last time I checked I thought MySQL dump used 'multivalue 
lists in inserts' for dumps, for the same reason that we use COPY


In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2006-07-19 01:20:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous:From: Matthew D. FullerDate: 2006-07-18 23:41:49
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2006-07-19 01:20:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2006-07-19 01:11:58
Subject: Re: url for TODO item, is it right?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2006-07-19 01:20:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous:From: Matthew D. FullerDate: 2006-07-18 23:41:49
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] 8.2 features?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group