Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: small regression script improvement

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: small regression script improvement
Date: 2006-06-18 23:14:11
Message-ID: 4495DE43.5000807@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>  
>
>>This suggested patch makes sure that the regression script can actually 
>>connect to the database rather than falling through after 60 seconds, as 
>>discussed on -hackers.
>>    
>>
>
>Oh, I see what you mean.  But surely that's the hard way.  The script
>should just fail where it currently "break"s out of the loop.  It's
>not any longer and it permits a more specific error message.
>
>
>  
>

Good point. I'll do that.

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2006-06-19 05:05:05
Subject: Re: table/index fillfactor control, try 2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-18 22:44:38
Subject: Re: small regression script improvement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group