Ludek Finstrle wrote:
> Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:12:58PM +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>> Ludek Finstrle wrote:
>>> I make patch againist CVS after yours huge commit. What's your opinion?
>> Is the second parameter of snprintf_add needed ?
>> Aren't the parameter values always strlen(the first parameter) ?
> You're right. I think more about it and "add" means add to the end
> so I changed the patch as you pointed.
>> Is snprintf_len needed instead of snprintf ?
>> Though the current code ignores snprintf errors, it's simply
>> my negligence..
> I'm voting for keeping safer snprintf_len. But I can change it if
> you wish.
> New patch attached.
OK please commit it.
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2006-06-14 21:43:15|
|Subject: Re: Memory Leak ?|
|Previous:||From: Campbell, Greg||Date: 2006-06-14 21:07:18|
|Subject: Re: float8 auto truncation issue in ODBC v. PGSQL|