Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?
Date: 2006-06-05 14:16:42
Message-ID: 44843CCA.1080306@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby wrote:
>
> What about my suggestion of runing CVS a second time if we get
> extraneous files the first go-round? I'm guessing there'd have to be a
> sleep in there as well...

The trouble with running "cvs update" a second time is that it will be
just as liable to fail as the first run. So I am following your
suggestion, but with this modification: after a sleep we will run "cvs
status" which will not have the same issues, because it doesn't create
or delete anything, and will show us any extraneous files/directories
that might be present.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2006-06-05 15:12:43 Re: Connection Broken with Custom Dicts for TSearch2
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-06-05 13:29:56 Re: More thoughts about planner's cost estimates