Greg Stark wrote:

>"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>  
>
>>One thought I had was to force Windows to use CVS export rather than update.
>>This has 2 disadvantages: it requires a complete repo fetch every run, even
>>if we don't need to do anything because nothing has changed, and it also
>>means we can't report the version numbers on files changed. 
>>    
>>
>
>You could also just have the windows machine rsync the directory from one of
>the other build machines?
>
>  
>


The farm is distributed - none of the members have any knowledge of the 
others. And it is a design requirement that no inbound access is 
required for buildfarm members, and that no tools are required other 
than  those that are required to build postgres.

Anyway, I think we have it covered now,.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? at 2006-06-04 21:40:31 from Greg Stark

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Zoltan Boszormenyi	Date: 2006-06-04 22:01:24
	Subject: psql -A (unaligned format) eats too much memory
Previous:	From: Greg Stark	Date: 2006-06-04 21:40:31
	Subject: Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?