| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |
| Date: | 2006-06-02 16:11:06 |
| Message-ID: | 4480631A.3020906@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sudden thought: is there any particularly good reason to use the cvs
> update -P switch in buildfarm repositories? If we simply eliminated
> the create/prune thrashing for these directories, it'd fix the problem,
> if Andrew's idea is correct. Probably save a few cycles too. And since
> people are really not supposed to be using these checkouts for anything
> else, they don't need to be pretty.
>
Good point. I'll do that, since it's pretty close to cost-free.
There will be a new release of buildfarm client code, with this and the
error name change, in the next day or so.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-06-02 16:22:46 | Re: COPY (query) TO file |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-02 15:57:45 | Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures? |