Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: is it possible to make this faster?

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is it possible to make this faster?
Date: 2006-05-28 01:11:47
Message-ID: 4478F8D3.7040104@paradise.net.nz (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> your time of 150 ms is looking like the slow case on my results.
> 
> Yeah... so what's wrong with my test?  Anyone else care to duplicate
> the test and see what they get?

Using your test [generating c from int(rand(1000))], I get 230 ms using 
5.0.18 on a P3 1000 Mhz (doing optimize table on t made no difference at 
all).

Cheers

Mark

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Brendan DuddridgeDate: 2006-05-28 09:37:57
Subject: App very unresponsive while performing simple update
Previous:From: PFCDate: 2006-05-27 21:04:51
Subject: Re: Speed Up Offset and Limit Clause

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group