Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table

From: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table
Date: 2006-05-10 16:55:13
Message-ID: 44621AF1.9000606@osdl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> Could you turn full_page_writes = off and do a few more tests? I think
> the full page writes is swamping the xlog and masking the performance we
> might see for normal small xlog writes.
> I'd try XLOG_BLCKSZ = 4096 and 8192 to start with. Thanks.

Ok, got data for XLOG_BLCKXZ at 4096, 8192, and 32768 with
full_page_wirtes = off. The new data is at the bottom of the page:
http://developer.osdl.org/markw/pgsql/xlog_blcksz.html

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-10 18:40:35 Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
Previous Message Mike Benoit 2006-05-10 16:23:38 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error