| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sven Suursoho <sven(at)spam(dot)pri(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: plpython improvements |
| Date: | 2006-05-05 18:56:44 |
| Message-ID: | 445B9FEC.6030701@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
>
> As an example of absurdity of this problem: let's assume there is known
> distribution with buggy gethostbyname(). Fact, that we know about this,
> shouldn't stop us developing TCP/IP applications. Especially, if there
> is also patch for this bug :)
>
> It would be real shame to prevent using generator for SETOF functions
> because it is most natural match for plpgsql's "return next"
All I was saying was that we need to account for the use of 2.4 :). So
as long as we document (as you suggest) we should be good. Sorry if I
wasn't clear.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> --Sven Suursoho
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-05 19:01:52 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2006-05-05 18:55:32 | Re: Page at a time index scan |