Re: Solaris ASM problem

From: Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Solaris ASM problem
Date: 2006-04-28 20:33:24
Message-ID: 44527C14.802@omniti.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Log Message:
>>>-----------
>>>Modify Solaris compiler build rules to use the cpp preprocessor, the the
>>>x86 file.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Well it compiles now, but it doesn't seem to work:
>>
>>http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=kudu&dt=2006-04-28%2016:30:01
>>
>>selecting default max_connections ... Abort - core dumped
>>
>>creating template1 database in
>>/export/home/pgfarm/forte/HEAD/pgsql.5120/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/data/base/1
>>... PANIC: stuck spinlock (dd0000b0) detected at lwlock.c:358
>>
>>
>
>OK, now that I have modified the build system to properly handle the
>preprocessing, it seems we have a problem with the ASM instructions.
>
>Theo? Comments?
>
>
What platform is that? (OS rev, architecture and word size)? I tested
the changes I submitted on Solaris 10 amd64.

--
// Theo Schlossnagle
// Principal Engineer -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
// Ecelerity: Run with it. -- http://www.omniti.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2006-04-28 20:39:45 Re: Solaris ASM problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-28 19:03:01 Solaris ASM problem

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-04-28 20:38:55 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2006-04-28 20:18:56 Re: Logging pg_autovacuum

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2006-04-28 20:39:45 Re: Solaris ASM problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-28 20:01:50 Re: plpython tracebacks