Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date: 2006-04-26 14:02:23
Message-ID: 444F7D6F.5080909@boreham.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
>
>The reason AMD is has held off from supporting DDR2 until now are:
>1.  DDR is EOL.  JEDEC is not ratifying any DDR faster than 200x2 while DDR2 standards as fast as 333x4 are likely to be ratified (note that Intel pretty much avoided DDR, leaving it to AMD, while DDR2 is Intel's main RAM technology.  Guess who has more pull with JEDEC?)
>
>  
>
DDR2 is to RDRAM as C# is to Java

;)



In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: William YuDate: 2006-04-26 14:19:38
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Previous:From: Ron PeacetreeDate: 2006-04-26 12:40:37
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group