>Actually, that was from an article from this last month that compared
>the dual core intel to the amd.  for every dollar spent on the intel,
>you got about half the performance of the amd.  Not bigotry.  fact.
>
>But don't believe me or the other people who've seen the difference.  Go
>buy the Intel box.  No skin off my back.
>  
>
I've been doing plenty of performance evaluation on a parallel application
we're developing here : on Dual Core Opterons, P4, P4D. I can say that
the Opterons open up a can of wupass on the Intel processors. Almost 2x
the performance on our application vs. what the SpecCPU numbers would
suggest.

In response to

• Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs at 2006-04-25 18:42:31 from Scott Marlowe

Responses

• Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs at 2006-04-25 21:00:08 from Joshua D. Drake

pgsql-performance by date

Next:	From: Joshua D. Drake	Date: 2006-04-25 21:00:08
	Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Previous:	From: Florian Weimer	Date: 2006-04-25 19:22:16
	Subject: Re: ip address data type