Re: Visual C++ 2005

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Visual C++ 2005
Date: 2006-04-21 19:37:48
Message-ID: 4449348C.8030906@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
>

> I'm not so sure it's a problem - from Visual Studio's redist.txt:
>
> For your convenience, we have provided the following folders for use
> when redistributing VC++ runtime files. Subject to the license terms for
> the software, you may redistribute the folder (unmodified) in the
> application local folder as a sub-folder with no change to the folder
> name.
Sounds like distri bloating, for no benefit.

Best would be if this manifest stuff could be omitted totally; we
probably could link to the old msvcrt then.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-04-21 20:28:13 Re: Visual C++ 2005
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-04-21 19:37:34 Re: Visual C++ 2005