Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Inserts optimization?

From: Gábriel Ákos <akos(dot)gabriel(at)i-logic(dot)hu>
To: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inserts optimization?
Date: 2006-04-15 08:32:56
Message-ID: 4440AFB8.4080806@i-logic.hu (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Francisco Reyes wrote:

> That is certainly something worth considering... Still I wonder if 2 
> more spindles will help enough to justify going to RAID 5. My 
> understanding is that RAID10 has simpler computations requirements which 
> is partly what makes it better for lots of random read/write. 

you are right. raid5 is definitely not suitable for database activities.
it is good for file servers, though.

-- 
Üdvözlettel,
Gábriel Ákos
-=E-Mail :akos(dot)gabriel(at)i-logic(dot)hu|Web:  http://www.i-logic.hu=-
-=Tel/fax:+3612367353            |Mobil:+36209278894            =-

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Gábriel ÁkosDate: 2006-04-15 08:35:41
Subject: Re: Inserts optimization?
Previous:From: Francisco ReyesDate: 2006-04-14 20:27:59
Subject: Re: Inserts optimization?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group