Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Further SPI

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Further SPI
Date: 2006-04-08 21:21:25
Message-ID: 44382955.90408@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-www
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> What about using Sourceforge for the donation process?  It's not
> great, but it's certainly better than SPI.

I am not suggesting we move away from SPI. What I am suggesting is that 
we help them improve their process. SPI is a good thing to back but they 
need help.

The problem with sourceforge is it is NOT a non-profit.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
-- 

             === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
       Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
       Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                      http://www.commandprompt.com/



In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-04-08 21:23:11
Subject: Re: Further SPI
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-04-08 19:59:55
Subject: Re: Further SPI

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-04-08 21:23:11
Subject: Re: Further SPI
Previous:From: DB SubscriptionsDate: 2006-04-08 20:36:41
Subject: [ANN] PostgreSqlClient 2.0 Beta 1 released.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group