Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix
Date: 2007-01-09 00:14:21
Message-ID: 4436.1168301661@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The problem is that this requires two runs even to proof the documentation,
>> which I think no one wants.

> So what would the API be to signal you want a draft build?
> gmake DRAFT="Y" html

I'd vote for

gmake draft

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2007-01-09 00:35:31 Re: table partioning performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 00:07:29 Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message L Bayuk 2007-01-09 00:34:08 Re: BCC55 and libpq 8.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-09 00:07:29 Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix