Luke Lonergan wrote:
> On 3/27/06 10:05 AM, "Gábriel Ákos" <akos(dot)gabriel(at)i-logic(dot)hu> wrote:
>> That gave me an idea. I thought that autovacuum is doing it right, but I
>> issued a vacuum full analyze verbose , and it worked all the day.
>> After that I've tweaked memory settings a bit too (more fsm_pages)
> Oops! I replied to your disk speed before I saw this.
> The only thing is - you probably don't want to do a "vacuum full", but
> rather a simple "vacuum" should be enough.
I thought that too. Autovacuum is running on our system but it didn't do
the trick. Anyway the issue is solved, thank you all for helping. :)
-=E-Mail :akos(dot)gabriel(at)i-logic(dot)hu|Web: http://www.i-logic.hu=-
-=Tel/fax:+3612367353 |Mobil:+36209278894 =-
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: george young||Date: 2006-03-27 18:47:33|
|Subject: simple join uses indexes, very slow|
|Previous:||From: Luke Lonergan||Date: 2006-03-27 18:14:45|
|Subject: Re: count(*) performance|