Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> It's only that much difference? Given all the other advantages of
>>> separating the JVM from the backends, I'd say you should gladly pay
>>> that price.
>>>
>>>
>> If I'm right, and the most common scenario is clients using connection pools, then it's very
>> likely that you don't get any advantages at all. Paying for nothing with a 440% increase in
>> calling time (at best) seems expensive :-)
>>
>
> You are focused too narrowly on a few performance numbers. In my mind
> the primary advantage is that it will *work*. I do not actually believe
> that you'll ever get the embedded-JVM approach to production-grade
> reliability, because of the fundamental problems with threading, error
> processing, etc.
>
My focus with PL/Java over the last year has been to make it a
production-grade product and I think I've succeeded pretty well. The
current list of open bugs is second to none. What fundamental problems
are you thinking of that hasn't been solved already?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren