Re: Automatically setting work_mem

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Automatically setting work_mem
Date: 2006-03-19 11:22:45
Message-ID: 441D3F05.3050406@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Luke Lonergan wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>>
>> On 3/17/06 9:59 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>>> This would buy what exactly?
>>
>>
>> I guess you didn't read the other 80% of the post.
>>
>> In short, faster performance through more aggressive runtime
>> compilation. A
>> JIT for the database kernel. It's not like I'm on shaky ground here -
>> other
>> commercial DBMS have done it for over a decade.
>>
> In exactly a fortnight from today, I'll repost my suggestion to rewrite
> the backend in Java ;-)

Please do! we haven't seen this suggestion for quite a while, I'm
starting to miss it...

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex bahdushka 2006-03-19 16:57:50 Re: PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-03-19 09:56:46 Re: PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2006-03-19 23:33:33 Re: [PATCHES] pg_freespacemap question
Previous Message Neil Conway 2006-03-18 22:11:56 Re: [PATCHES] Bonjour registration on Intel Macs is broken