| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | dmitry(at)karasik(dot)eu(dot)org |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: implement prepared queries in plperl |
| Date: | 2006-03-05 16:45:58 |
| Message-ID: | 440B15C6.1080307@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Dmitry Karasik wrote:
>
>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this patch going to be applied?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am waiting for an update from Dmitry.
>>> cheers
>>> andrew
>>>
>>
>>
>> I believe this is some kind of misunderstanding, sorry if from my part,
>> but I don't think any further updates are necessary.
>>
>>
>
> OK, I'll take another look. I'm still curious to know why pltcl
> doesn't need to call spi_free_plan. Maybe it does need to ...
>
>
I have committed the patch and docs for this - it's an important feature
and I would like people banging on it.
I'd like to review the API we provide to plperl, though - I don't like
it much. I think that should be an 8.2 TODO.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pierre Racine | 2006-03-05 17:13:11 | Defining my own operator's precedence |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-03-05 16:30:26 | Re: Deleting loid from the database |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Bertheau | 2006-03-05 17:34:10 | TODO item: remove postmaster -o option |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2006-03-05 08:25:49 | Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2 |